877-Ben-Hall 517-798-5801 877-Ben-Hall Awards & Recognition
SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION | Call 877-BEN-HALL
Assault with intent to murder is the most serious assault charge in Michigan. It carries up to life in prison. The prosecution must prove specific intent to kill, not recklessness, not extreme indifference, and not intent to cause serious injury short of death. That intent almost never comes from direct proof. Prosecutors usually try to build it from the circumstances of the assault, the manner of the attack, the defendant’s statements, and any other fact they can turn into a theory of intent to kill.
That theory is where these cases often turn. It is also where a strong defense can break the case apart. Attorney Ben Hall is a former Ingham County prosecutor who charged and evaluated serious felony assault cases from the other side. He has tried serious criminal cases to verdict on both sides. AWIM cases demand preparation, strategy, and real trial skill.
Call 877-BEN-HALL today for a confidential consultation.
Assault with intent to murder is a felony offense under MCL 750.83. The prosecution must prove three elements:
The prosecution must prove both the assault itself and the specific intent to kill beyond a reasonable doubt. Intent to kill exists only in the defendant’s mind, so the state almost always tries to prove it by inference from outside facts. That inference often becomes the most important issue in the case.
For the broader framework of assault charges in Michigan, see Michigan assault defense.
| Charge | MCL | Max Penalty | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assault with intent to murder | 750.83 | Life in prison or any term of years | No mandatory minimum. Sentencing depends on the guidelines and the facts. |
This is the statutory maximum. The actual sentence depends on criminal history, the specific facts, the Michigan sentencing guidelines, and the strength of the defense.
MCL 750.83 allows a sentence of life in prison or any term of years. The statute does not impose a mandatory minimum. The sentencing judge uses Michigan’s felony sentencing guidelines to determine the recommended minimum range. The offense variables can reflect weapon use, the severity of any injury, and other aggravating facts. When no life-threatening injury occurred and the prior record is limited, the guideline range may sit far below the life maximum. Habitual offender enhancements can still raise exposure sharply for defendants with prior felony convictions.
Assault with intent to do great bodily harm under MCL 750.84 carries up to 10 years in prison. It requires specific intent to cause great bodily harm less than murder, meaning serious injury short of death. Learn more about assault with intent to do great bodily harm in Michigan.
Felonious assault under MCL 750.82 carries up to four years in prison. It requires an assault with a dangerous weapon, but it does not require specific intent to kill or specific intent to cause great bodily harm. See felonious assault in Michigan.
Assault with intent to murder under MCL 750.83 carries up to life in prison. It requires specific intent to kill. That is the highest specific-intent requirement in Michigan’s assault statutes.
The key difference between AWIM and GBH is the target of the intent. GBH requires intent to cause great bodily harm. AWIM requires intent to cause death. Prosecutors sometimes charge both when the intent proof is unclear. A strong defense must treat those two intent levels as separate factual questions.
Attempted murder requires proof that the defendant took a substantial step toward committing murder and acted with the specific intent to kill. AWIM requires proof of an assault committed with the specific intent to kill. AWIM focuses on an assault plus intent to kill. Attempted murder focuses on a substantial step toward a killing, also with intent to kill.
When prosecutors file both charges, the defense still targets the same central issue: can the state actually prove specific intent to kill beyond a reasonable doubt?
AWIM cases rise or fall on the prosecution’s effort to prove intent to kill. Prosecutors usually build that theory from several different sources of evidence, and each one can be challenged.
Prosecutors look at how the defendant attacked, what weapon was used, where any blows were directed, and how many times the defendant struck. They often argue that attacks aimed at vital areas show that only an intent to kill makes sense.
Any statement by the defendant that sounds like a threat to kill can become powerful evidence. We review every recorded statement, dispatch recording, witness account, and relevant social media evidence.
Prosecutors often use prior threats, hostility, or relationship history to argue premeditation and specific intent. We examine how that evidence came in, whether it is admissible, and whether it really supports the inference the state wants the jury to draw.
AWIM is often charged alongside attempted murder, GBH, and felonious assault. Prosecutors use that stack to create pressure in plea talks. The defense has to attack each charge on its own terms instead of letting the state blend them together.
The most important defense is often the most direct one: forcing the prosecution to prove specific intent to kill beyond a reasonable doubt. Was the incident brief and impulsive instead of sustained and targeted? Does the manner of the assault fit intent to cause serious injury more than intent to kill? Does the absence of fatal or near-fatal injury undermine the state’s theory? We challenge every inference the prosecution tries to use.
Michigan’s Self-Defense Act applies fully to AWIM charges. In these cases, self-defense can undermine both the assault element and the intent element. If intent can be inferred at all, the defense may show that the defendant acted to protect against imminent harm rather than to kill. Read more about self-defense law in Michigan.
If the incident happened in the heat of passion, after adequate provocation, and before a reasonable chance to cool off, that can directly undermine the prosecution’s claim of deliberate intent to kill. We develop that issue as a stand-alone attack on the most important element in the case.
When the evidence does not support intent to kill but may support intent to cause great bodily harm, reduction from AWIM to GBH may be possible. That can cut exposure from life imprisonment to a 10-year felony. In other cases, if the state cannot prove either specific-intent theory but can prove assault with a dangerous weapon, further reduction to felonious assault may be realistic.
Statements often carry enormous weight in AWIM cases. If police took a statement in violation of Miranda or under circumstances that made it involuntary, suppressing that statement can dramatically weaken the prosecution’s case.
Life sentence exposure. AWIM carries life exposure. Sentencing presentation can have enormous impact on the final outcome.
Permanent felony record. An AWIM conviction is a severe felony that affects employment, housing, licensing, and nearly every background-check context for life.
Firearm rights. A felony conviction eliminates firearm rights under Michigan law and federal law.
Immigration. For non-citizens, an AWIM conviction will almost certainly trigger removal proceedings and other permanent immigration consequences.
Assault with intent to murder is a felony under MCL 750.83. It carries up to life in prison or any term of years. The prosecution must prove that the defendant committed an assault with the specific intent to kill. The charge focuses on intent at the moment of the assault, not on the outcome.
GBH under MCL 750.84 requires specific intent to cause great bodily harm less than murder. AWIM under MCL 750.83 requires specific intent to kill. AWIM carries up to life in prison, while GBH carries up to 10 years. Read more about GBH in Michigan.
Both charges require specific intent to kill. Attempted murder requires a substantial step toward murder. AWIM requires an assault committed with that same intent to kill. Prosecutors often file both when they believe the facts support both theories.
No. AWIM does not require proof of injury. A prosecutor can charge AWIM even if the alleged victim suffered no injury at all, as long as the state claims it can prove specific intent to kill.
Usually through circumstantial evidence. Prosecutors rely on the manner of the attack, the weapon used, where force was directed, any injuries, the defendant’s statements, and the history between the parties. Each of those inferences can be challenged.
Yes. Michigan’s Self-Defense Act applies fully to AWIM charges. Once self-defense is properly raised, the prosecution must disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Learn more about self-defense in Michigan.
In some cases, yes. When the state cannot prove intent to kill but may be able to prove intent to cause great bodily harm, reduction from AWIM to GBH may be possible. In some fact patterns, further reduction to felonious assault may also be available.
Assault with intent to murder is the most serious assault charge in Michigan. It carries life exposure, demands experienced trial counsel, and requires a defense that attacks the prosecution’s intent theory at every stage.
At Ben Hall Law, you are not just a client. You are the client. Every AWIM case gets the focused, intensive attention that a charge of this severity demands.
Call 877-BEN-HALL or contact us online to schedule a confidential consultation. Your fight is our fight. Let’s start today.
Ben Hall Law represents clients facing assault with intent to murder charges throughout Michigan. Attorney Ben Hall is a former Ingham County prosecutor, former Michigan law enforcement officer, and Marine Corps veteran. Bar No. P84975. Reviewed and updated 2026.
