877-Ben-Hall 517-798-5801 877-Ben-Hall Awards & Recognition
One OWI arrest in Michigan can ground a pilot faster than bad weather if federal rules aren’t handled right. A DUI or OWI arrest is serious for anyone. For a licensed pilot, it carries consequences that extend far beyond Michigan’s criminal courts. The moment you are charged, two separate and largely independent systems are activated: the Michigan criminal justice process and the Federal Aviation Administration’s regulatory oversight of your airman and medical certificates.
What you do, and what you fail to do, in the first 60 days can determine whether you keep flying. This guide explains both systems, where they intersect, and why pilots facing these charges need legal counsel that understands aviation law, not just criminal defense.
Speak With a Pilot Defense Attorney Today
Michigan’s OWI process follows a familiar path: arraignment, pretrial hearings, plea negotiations or trial, and sentencing. The outcome, whether a conviction, a reduced charge, or a dismissal, is what most defendants focus on. For pilots, that focus is dangerously incomplete.
The FAA operates under its own authority through 14 CFR Part 61 and the Federal Aviation Act. It does not wait for your criminal case to resolve, it does not coordinate with Michigan prosecutors, and it does not treat a favorable plea deal as the end of the matter. The FAA is concerned with one question: does this person’s conduct raise questions about their fitness to hold an airman certificate or medical certificate?
A plea arrangement that minimizes your Michigan record can still trigger significant FAA consequences if it is handled without awareness of federal reporting obligations and regulatory standards.
Yes, and the timeline is strict but it is important to understand when the clock actually starts. The 60-day FAA reporting clock does not start at arrest. It starts when a “motor vehicle action” occurs, such as a conviction or a license suspension tied to alcohol or drugs. Under 14 CFR 61.15(e), pilots are required to report any motor vehicle action to the FAA Civil Aviation Security Division within 60 days of that action. The report must include your name, address, date of birth, airman certificate number, the type of motor vehicle action, the date it occurred, and the state that took the action. It is sent to P.O. Box 25810, Oklahoma City, OK 73125. While mail is reliable use certified mail with return receipt the FAA also lists a fax option at (405) 954-4989 and an online notification portal at https://ashapps.faa.gov/notificationletter. Because submission methods can change, confirm current accepted options before sending and keep proof of delivery regardless of the method you use.
Many pilots do not expect this issue. If Michigan suspends your driver’s license because you refused a breath test or registered above the legal limit, the FAA treats that suspension as a reportable motor vehicle action.
Federal law requires reporting under 14 CFR 61.15(c)(2). The rule covers the suspension, cancellation, or revocation of driving privileges for reasons related to intoxication, impairment, or influence. This requirement applies even if your criminal case is still pending. It also applies even if a court later does not convict you.
You must report each motor vehicle action separately. Multiple actions can arise from the same incident.
For example, Michigan may first impose an administrative license suspension. A court may later enter a conviction. Each event counts as a separate reportable action.
You must report each action within 60 days of that specific event.
When submitting your written report, include the following:
Send via certified mail and retain proof of mailing. If submitting by fax or online portal, save your confirmation.
The FAA treats a failure to report as a separate violation from the underlying DUI. In some cases, the agency takes more aggressive certificate action for nondisclosure than for the original offense.
Failure to report can signal dishonesty. Regulators take that concern seriously when evaluating people responsible for the safety of aircraft and passengers.
The FAA can discover undisclosed incidents through record checks, including the National Driver Register. Because of this, regulators often uncover incidents that pilots did not report.
If you miss the 60 day reporting deadline, you create a second problem while trying to manage the first one.
An arrest alone is not a motor vehicle action under 14 CFR 61.15 and does not trigger the 60-day reporting requirement on its own. However, even without a conviction, an arrest triggers MedXPress disclosure and potential FAA review. It is a mistake to assume an arrest without conviction carries no FAA consequences.
A DUI or OWI conviction is a reportable motor vehicle action and will factor directly into FAA certificate and medical certificate decisions going forward.
Even without a conviction, a Michigan Secretary of State administrative suspension, triggered by implied consent refusal or a high BAC reading, qualifies as a motor vehicle action under 61.15(c) and is both reportable and relevant to the FAA.
Refusal to submit to chemical testing is noted by the FAA and may be viewed as an indicator of consciousness of guilt or underlying substance use concerns.
A BAC significantly above the legal limit can prompt the FAA to scrutinize the incident more closely, particularly in relation to medical certificate eligibility.
Under 14 CFR 61.15(d), two motor vehicle actions that are not from the same incident within any 36-month period create grounds for suspension or revocation of an airman certificate and almost always trigger serious FAA scrutiny. The rule has three practical takeaways here. First, report each motor vehicle action within 60 days of that specific action. Second, for the two-in-three-years threshold, actions from the same incident generally do not count as a second independent event. Third and this is important the FAA requires your report to state whether the action arises from the same incident or factual circumstances as any previously reported action. That disclosure is part of the required contents of the report itself, not optional context.
Whether multiple actions from one incident ultimately qualify as a “second motor vehicle action” can get technical. Do not assume you are safe because it was the same stop. Get advice before deciding what to report or how to report it.
The 60-day clock starts from the date of the motor vehicle action itself the conviction date or the date your license was suspended, canceled, revoked, or denied not from your arrest date.
Get a Confidential Consultation
Your medical certificate is often where pilots feel the greatest immediate impact. This is the document that determines whether you can legally exercise the privileges of your airman certificate at all.
On your next FAA medical application (MedXPress / Form 8500-8), you must disclose alcohol- or drug-related arrests and convictions, as well as any administrative actions including refusal-based suspensions, and provide details about the event and jurisdiction. Omitting or falsifying this information is a federal offense that can result in certificate revocation and criminal prosecution, consequences that are substantially worse than any DUI disclosure.
The FAA’s aviation medical examiner will review your disclosure and determine whether the matter warrants further review by the FAA’s Aerospace Medical Certification Division. The FAA will assess whether the conduct reflects alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence, applying criteria distinct from those used in criminal sentencing.
If the FAA identifies red flags, such as a very high BAC (often 0.15 or higher, per FAA medical disposition guidelines), multiple alcohol-related events, refusal-related actions, or other evidence suggesting a pattern of misuse, it may require a more intensive evaluation and monitoring pathway through the Human Intervention Motivation Study (HIMS) program. This involves a comprehensive substance abuse evaluation by a HIMS-designated aviation medical examiner, the potential for a special issuance medical certificate with conditions attached, and ongoing monitoring that may include random alcohol testing. The process adds significant time to medical certification and requires full cooperation and documentation throughout. Pilots who successfully complete the HIMS program have demonstrated strong long-term safety records, but the path requires full commitment and transparency from the outset.
For private pilots flying under Part 91, if your medical certificate remains valid and your airman certificate has not been suspended or revoked, you may generally continue to fly while your criminal case is pending. It is also worth noting that aviation has its own alcohol rules separate from the driving context 14 CFR 61.15 and the adjacent 61.16 address FAA consequences for certain alcohol-related conduct in an aviation setting, including refusal of alcohol testing. However, you must assess your own fitness honestly, and employer policies may impose additional restrictions independent of FAA rules.
For commercial pilots flying under Part 121 or Part 135, employer notification requirements, company policies, and insurance conditions typically impose far more immediate grounding obligations. Assuming you can continue flying because the FAA has not yet acted is a significant risk in a commercial context.
For a first offense, automatic revocation is generally not the outcome. FAA certificate action is discretionary in most single-incident cases, and the FAA does not move quickly. However, discretionary does not mean unlikely, and several aggravating factors increase the probability of certificate action substantially:
The fewer aggravating factors present and the more proactively and transparently you handle reporting and medical disclosure, the better positioned you are.
This is where experienced aviation-aware counsel makes a measurable difference.
Michigan criminal defense attorneys frequently negotiate reduced charges, such as operating while visibly impaired (OWVI) instead of OWI, or charge reductions under the Holmes Youthful Trainee Act (HYTA) that shield convictions from public records. These outcomes can be meaningful in the Michigan criminal context. For the FAA, they are not the end of the analysis.
The FAA looks at the underlying conduct, not the label attached to the final disposition. If the arrest arose from suspected alcohol impairment and a chemical test was administered or refused, that conduct is within the FAA’s view regardless of how it was resolved in state court. A HYTA disposition that keeps an offense off your Michigan record does not keep it off your MedXPress application or out of FAA consideration.
Plea strategy in a pilot’s DUI case must account for both how the charge resolves in Michigan court and how that resolution will be documented and disclosed to the FAA. These are not always the same calculation, and optimizing for one without considering the other is a common and costly mistake.
For pilots flying recreationally or personally under Part 91, the consequences are primarily regulatory, covering FAA certificate and medical certificate implications. There is no employer reporting obligation in most cases, though that may change if you operate aircraft as part of business activities.
Pilots flying charter or corporate operations face additional layers: employer notification requirements, insurance policy conditions that may include grounding provisions, and company standards that often exceed FAA minimums. A DUI can trigger immediate suspension from flight duty pending investigation, regardless of the criminal outcome.
For airline pilots, the stakes are highest. Major carriers require disclosure of DUI arrests and convictions as a condition of employment. Nondisclosure is typically grounds for termination independent of the legal outcome. Depending on the carrier, a DUI can affect advancement, captain upgrade timelines, and long-term career trajectory even when the pilot retains their certificates. The HIMS process, if required, may impose a period of grounding that carries direct financial and professional consequences.
Two motor vehicle actions within 36 months place you in a fundamentally different regulatory category. At that threshold, the FAA’s presumption shifts toward substance abuse, certificate suspension becomes substantially more likely, and HIMS involvement is effectively certain. Long-term monitoring, random testing, and a special issuance medical process will define your path back to flying, if that path remains open.
If you are facing a second offense as a certificated pilot, the urgency of obtaining aviation-aware legal counsel cannot be overstated. At that stage, this is no longer just a criminal defense issue. It is a career preservation matter.
In most cases, yes, if your certificates are valid and you are medically fit. However, commercial pilots should review employer policies immediately, as company standards often impose more restrictive obligations than FAA regulations alone.
It can. Refusal triggers an implied consent suspension that qualifies as a motor vehicle action under 14 CFR 61.15 and is independently reportable to the FAA. It may also be viewed as an indicator of concern in the FAA’s broader conduct review.
The administrative suspension still qualifies as a reportable motor vehicle action under 14 CFR 61.15. You must report it within 60 days regardless of the criminal outcome.
No. An expungement under Michigan law may remove the conviction from state records, but it does not alter your obligation to disclose the matter to the FAA or affect how the FAA treats the underlying conduct.
Yes, potentially. Canada treats DUI and OWI convictions as serious criminal offenses and may find you inadmissible at the border without special relief such as a Temporary Resident Permit or Criminal Rehabilitation approval. Pilots with international operations should explore these options early a border denial can independently ground cross-border flying regardless of your FAA certificate status. This is a separate but significant complication that requires its own legal analysis.
A standard criminal defense attorney can navigate Michigan’s OWI process competently. What most cannot do is simultaneously evaluate the FAA reporting implications of each strategic decision, advise on how a proposed plea will read on a MedXPress application, or coordinate the timing of disclosures to minimize regulatory exposure.
Pilots facing DUI charges need counsel who can work across both the state criminal system and the federal aviation regulatory framework, someone who understands that the goal is not just the best Michigan outcome, but the best overall outcome for your certificate, your medical eligibility, and your career.
If you are a Michigan pilot facing OWI or DUI charges, the decisions you make in the next 60 days will shape how both the state criminal case and the FAA regulatory process unfold. Acting quickly, reporting accurately, and building a coordinated legal strategy are not optional steps. They are the foundation of protecting everything you have built as an aviator.
Don’t let a single mistake end your flying career. Contact our office today for a confidential consultation tailored to Michigan pilots facing OWI charges.
Contact Us for a Confidential Consultation
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you are a Michigan pilot facing criminal charges, consult an attorney promptly regarding both state and federal consequences.
