Serving all of Michigan
SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION call icon877-Ben-Hall

Awards & Recognition

In today’s correctional facilities, body-worn cameras are intended to promote transparency and protect both officers and inmates. However, when only a portion of an interaction is captured, the footage can create a distorted picture. For Michigan corrections officers, that partial recording can be used to justify disciplinary action, termination, or even criminal prosecution, especially in high-pressure or use-of-force situations.

At Ben Hall Law, our East Lansing criminal defense attorneys have extensive experience representing corrections officers who face allegations of misconduct. We understand the realities of working in correctional environments and know how to build strong defenses when body cam footage fails to tell the whole story.

Blurred police car with flashing blue lights and an officer in the distance at night, symbolizing an incident with incomplete body cam footage.

Why Incomplete Footage Can Be Dangerous for Michigan Officers

Correctional officers often work in fast-paced, high-pressure situations. Body cameras may not be activated until after an incident has begun. Poor camera angles, physical barriers, and equipment malfunctions can further limit what the footage captures. Yet, investigators, administrators, and even prosecutors may still treat the partial recording as the central piece of evidence.

This can lead to unfair assumptions about how and why a situation escalated, even when the officer acted by policy or in self-defense. When footage lacks context, officers are left vulnerable to scrutiny based on incomplete and misleading information.

Key Evidence That Strengthens the Defense

When defending corrections officers against allegations of misconduct, it is crucial to look beyond the body camera footage and develop a comprehensive understanding of what happened. Our legal team focuses on gathering and presenting supplementary evidence that supports your actions and fills in the blanks.

This includes:

  • Witness interviews:Other staff members, supervisors, and inmates may have witnessed parts of the interaction not shown in the footage. Their statements can explain what preceded the video or confirm your account of events.
  • Incident reports and shift logs:Internal documentation often contains essential details, including when the camera was activated, prior inmate behavior, use-of-force justifications, and officer statements recorded immediately after the event.
  • Expert testimony: In complex or controversial cases, we consult with corrections experts to explain standard procedures, clarify appropriate use-of-force protocols, and address why actions seen in a video may have been necessary or unavoidable.

A single video clip should not determine the outcome of your career. Building a strong defense requires connecting the entire chain of events and ensuring your voice is heard.

Protecting the Careers and Reputations of Michigan Corrections Officers

Corrections officers perform essential, often dangerous work in high-stress environments. When allegations arise, especially those based on limited video evidence, it is easy for the narrative to shift unfairly. At Ben Hall Law, we know what’s at stake for our clients, including your job, your license, your reputation, and your future.

We stand with corrections officers throughout Michigan and provide strategic, experienced defense tailored to your unique role and responsibilities. Our team will ensure that your side of the story is backed by evidence and presented in the strongest possible terms.

Contact Ben Hall Law Today

If you are a Michigan corrections officer facing allegations based on incomplete body cam footage, do not try to navigate the system alone. Call 877-BEN-HALL (517-798-5801) or contact us online for a confidential consultation. We are ready to fight for your rights, your record, and your career.